Incorporating Culturally Responsive Teaching Practices in Mathematics Education
Singh, Haribansh Prasad
Assistant Professor, Teachers’ Training College, Bhagalpur
Abstract
Mathematics, often heralded as a universal language of logic and numbers, can unintentionally exclude students from diverse cultural backgrounds, resulting in feelings of alienation, disengagement, and academic underachievement. This article investigates the role of Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) in mathematics education as a means of bridging cultural divides and fostering inclusive, equitable learning environments. CRT acknowledges and values students’ cultural identities, experiences, and knowledge systems, integrating them meaningfully into the formal mathematics curriculum. This pedagogical approach emphasizes cultural relevance, identity affirmation, and equity, ensuring that every student has an opportunity to succeed.
The theoretical underpinnings of CRT are rooted in the works of scholars such as Ladson-Billings and Moll et al., who challenge deficit perspectives and underscore the importance of leveraging students’” funds of knowledge.” CRT’s tenets focus on making curriculum content culturally relevant, affirming students’ identities, and dismantling inequitable power dynamics in education. In mathematics classrooms, this involves connecting mathematical concepts to students’ lived experiences and cultural contexts, thereby fostering a deeper appreciation and understanding of the subject. Practical strategies for implementing CRT in mathematics education are outlined, including leveraging students’ cultural funds of knowledge designing culturally relevant word problems, and employing cooperative learning activities. Examples include integrating traditional art forms, indigenous architectural designs, and culturally significant practices to teach geometric and measurement concepts. Additionally, the use of technology and multicultural resources further enriches the learning experience by creating interactive and culturally resonant educational opportunities. The article also emphasizes fostering a growth mindset, encouraging students to view mathematical ability as a developable skill, and celebrating diverse problem-solving approaches. While CRT offers transformative potential, its implementation is not without challenges. Teachers may face obstacles such as time constraints, limited cultural knowledge, and the risk of perpetuating stereotypes. The article highlights the necessity of professional development, institutional support, and community engagement to overcome these barriers. Teachers must also strive for authenticity and avoid tokenistic representations of culture, ensuring that materials and activities are both meaningful and respectful. The benefits of CRT in mathematics are manifold. It enhances student engagement, fosters a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts, promotes academic achievement, and cultivates cultural competence. By validating students’ cultural identities and connecting mathematics to their lived experiences, CRT empowers students to see themselves as capable mathematicians and active contributors to a multicultural society. Ultimately, CRT reimagines mathematics classrooms as inclusive spaces where diversity is celebrated, equity is prioritized, and all students are equipped to succeed. This approach not only enriches academic outcomes but also prepares students to thrive in an increasingly diverse and interconnected world.
Keywords: mathematics, culturally responsive teaching (CRT), inclusion, equity, cultural identities, funds of knowledge, curriculum, engagement, cultural relevance, cooperative learning, professional development, cultural competence.
Impact Statement
The article, “Incorporating Culturally Responsive Teaching Practices in Mathematics Education” advocates for integrating Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) to create equitable and inclusive mathematics classrooms. CRT bridges cultural divides, values students’ identities, and connects mathematical concepts to their lived experiences. The approach promotes engagement, fosters deeper understanding, and enhances academic achievement, preparing students for a multicultural world. Despite challenges such as time constraints and the risk of stereotypes, the paper highlights strategies like leveraging cultural knowledge, cooperative learning, and professional development to overcome these barriers. This pedagogical transformation enriches learning experiences, empowers students to thrive, and ensures equity and cultural competence in mathematics education.
About The Author
Haribansh Prasad Singh, born on 19th January 1968, is currently serving as an Assistant Professor at the Teachers’ Training College in Bhagalpur, Bihar, India. His professional address is D-9, 10 & NS Plot, Large Industrial Estate, Barari, Bhagalpur, Bihar (PIN-812003). He can be reached via email at hpsingh4104@gmail.com or by phone at 9431001733.
He holds a strong academic background in Mathematics and Education. He completed his B.Sc. (Honours) in Mathematics from T.N.B. College, Bhagalpur, followed by an M.Sc. in Mathematics from the Post Graduate Department of Mathematics at T.M. Bhagalpur University. He also holds a B.Ed. degree from Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), New Delhi, and an M.Ed. from Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, Haryana. In addition, he has earned a Certificate in Computing (CIC) from IGNOU.
Mr. Singh has been working as an Assistant Professor at Teachers’ Training College, Bhagalpur since July 2016. Prior to this, he served as a Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) in Mathematics at S.K.P. Vidya Vihar, Bhagalpur from 23rd March 1998 to June 2016.
References
Ali, C. A. (2023). Re-enacting mathematics values through cultural symbols. Indonesian Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.31258/ijsteame.v2i2.13
Allexsaht-Snider, M., & Hart, L. E. (2001). ‘mathematics for all’: How do we get there? Theory into Practice, 40(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4002_3
Apple, M. W. (1996). Power, meaning and identity: Critical sociology of education in the United States. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569960170201
Boaler, J. (2022). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative mathematics, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
Chapman, T., & Hobbel, N. (2010). Social justice pedagogy across the curriculum. Mahwah, NJ.
Cruse, S. K. (2019). Bringing culture into the classroom: The impact of culturally relevant pedagogy on student engagement and self-efficacy in social studies.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
E. L. Last, a guide to curriculum planning in English language arts. (1989), (6360). Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice teachers college. Multicultural Education Services.
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teacher’s College Press.
Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., Floyd-Tenery, M., Rivera, A., Rendon, P., Gonzales, R., & Amanti, C. (1993). Teacher research on funds of knowledge: Learning from households.
Gramsci, A. (2020). Selections from the prison notebooks. In the applied theatre reader (pp. 141–142). Rutledge.
Greer, B., Mukhopadhyay, S., Powell, A. B., & Nelson-Barber, S. (2009). Culturally responsive mathematics education. Rutledge New York.
Gutíerrez, J. F., Brown, S. A., & Alibali, M. W. (2018). Relational equity and mathematics learning: Mutual construction during collaborative problem solving. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 4(1), 159–187.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning together and alone: Co- operative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Prentice Hall, Incorporated.
Kadonsi, K., “” empowering students through indigenous knowledge: Benefits of indigenizing mathematics education in southern province. Zambia.”
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543675
Moschkovich, J. N. (2010). Language and mathematics education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research.
Nieto, S. (1992). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. Educational Resources Information Center.
Oyserman, D. (2001). Self-concept and identity.
Saathoff, S. D. (2015). Funds of knowledge and community cultural wealth: Exploring how preservice teachers can work effectively with Mexican and Mexican American students. Critical Questions in Education, 6(1), 30–40.
Sofroniou, A., Lokusuriyage, D., & Premnath, B. (2024). Exploring teaching strategies to bridge the educational equity gap in higher education mathematics for minoritised ethnic students. International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(4), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.33422/ijhep.v5i4.873
Solano-Campos, A., Hopkins, M., & Quaynor, L. (2020). Linguistically responsive teaching in preserve teacher education: A review of the literature through the lens of cultural-historical activity theory. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118808785
Villalpando, O. (2003). Self-segregation or self-preservation? A critical race theory and Latina/o critical theory analysis of a study of Chicana/o college students. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(5), 619–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000142922
Villegas, A. M., Strom, K., & Lucas, T. (2012). Closing the racial/ethnic gap between students of color and their teachers: An elusive goal. Equity and Excellence in Education, 45(2), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2012.656541
Walster, E., & Walster, G. W. (1975). Equity and social justice. Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb00001.x