International Council for Education, Research and Training

Investigating the impact of erroneous use of memes on effective communication

 

Okafor, Amaka Yvonne

Department of Igbo & other Nigerian languages, Nwafor Orizu College of Education, Nsugbe, Anambra State, Nigeria

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0414-4381

 

Abstract

In the ever-evolving digital age, the influence of memes on effective communication cannot be overstated. However, their widespread popularity has also led to a proliferation of erroneous and misleading content. Guided by cultural evolution and evolutionary game theories, this study delves into the impact of the erroneous use of memes within this dynamic landscape. It explores the cognitive effects of encountering such memes on receivers and investigates the factors contributing to the dissemination of erroneous memes. This research identifies key factors contributing to the creation and spread of erroneous memes, such as confirmation bias, emotional appeal, sensationalism, social media algorithms, cognitive biases, and social reinforcement. In addition to its findings, the study provides practical recommendations for memetic literacy and responsible meme creation and sharing. This study contributes to knowledge by advancing our understanding of memes as a unique form of digital communication and their role in shaping public discourse. 

 

Keywords: Investigation, impact, erroneous use, memes, effective communication.

 

Impact Statement

The research on the impact of erroneous use of memes on effective communication addresses a critical gap in understanding the dynamics of digital discourse in the contemporary era. By examining the cognitive effects of encountering misleading memes and identifying the factors driving their dissemination, this study provides invaluable insights into the mechanisms shaping online communication. The findings of this research highlight the significant role of confirmation bias, emotional appeal, sensationalism, social media algorithms, cognitive biases, and social reinforcement in the creation and spread of erroneous memes. By shedding light on these factors, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how misinformation proliferates within digital environments. Moreover, the practical recommendations for memetic literacy and responsible meme creation and sharing offer actionable strategies to mitigate the negative impact of misleading content. These recommendations have the potential to empower individuals to critically evaluate the memes they encounter and engage in more informed online interactions. Overall, this research advances our comprehension of memes as a distinctive form of digital communication and their influence on public discourse. By fostering greater awareness and promoting responsible meme usage, this study contributes to the enhancement of online communication practices and the cultivation of a more discerning digital society.

 

About Author

Dr. Amaka Yvonne Okafor is a dedicated educator with a wealth of experience in academia and project management. Currently serving as a Lecturer at Nwafor Orizu College of Education, Nsugbe, she plays a pivotal role in shaping the academic and personal development of students from diverse backgrounds. With a Ph.D. in Linguistics from Imo State University and a Professional Diploma in Education from Nwafor Orizu College of Education, she possesses a strong foundation in both her subject matter and pedagogy. Her commitment to scholarly research is evident through her publications in reputable journals, exploring topics ranging from lexical change in literature to the role of Nigerian Pidgin in communication. Dr. Okafor’s active participation in conferences further underscores her dedication to advancing knowledge and engaging with academic communities. Beyond her professional pursuits, Dr. Okafor enjoys traveling, reading, and fostering meaningful connections with others. 

 

References

  1. Beusch, P. (2022). Holism or reductionism, this is the main question in reality. Journal of Pragmatic Constructivism, 12(1), 152-161.

  2. Boudana, S., Frosh, P., & Cohen, A. A. (2017). Reviving icons to death: when historic photographs become digital memes. Media, Culture & Society, 39(8), 1210-1230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717690818

  3. Cancelas-Ouviña, L. P. (2021). Humor in times of COVID-19 in Spain: Viewing coronavirus through memes disseminated via WhatsApp. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(1), 611788. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611788 

  4. Chaudhry, S. J., & Wald, K. A. (2022). Overcoming listener skepticism: Costly signaling in communication increases perceived honesty. Current Opinion in Psychology, 48(1), 101442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101442

  5. Cherry, C. (1957). On human communication. Cambridge: MIT Press

  6. Chowdhury, A., & Chakraborty, P. (2021). Memes that evoke emotions: a neurodesign strategy for brand communication and experience. In Design for Tomorrow—Volume 1: Proceedings of ICoRD 2021 (pp. 147-156). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0041-8_13 

  7. Contreras Jr, L. E. (2021). Memes against the machine: a rhetorical analysis of resistance and parody use in internet memes and online comments on Instagram (Doctoral dissertation, California State University, Los Angeles).

  8. Courtois, C., & Frissen, T. (2023). Computer Vision and Internet Meme Genealogy: An Evaluation of Image Feature Matching as a Technique for Pattern Detection. Communication Methods and Measures, 17(1), 17-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2022.2122423 

  9. Denisova, A. (2019). Internet memes and society: Social, cultural, and political contexts. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469404 

  10. Diringer, D. (1982). The book before printing: ancient, medieval and oriental. Courier, Dover publication.

  11. Drees, L., Luetkemeier, R., & Kerber, H. (2021). Necessary or oversimplification? On the strengths and limitations of current assessments to integrate social dimensions in planetary boundaries. Ecological Indicators, 129(1), 108009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108009 

  12. Dynel, M., & Poppi, F. I. (2023). Fidelis ad mortem: Multimodal discourses and ideologies in Black Lives Matter and Blue Lives Matter (non) humorous memes. Information, Communication & Society, 26(4), 847-873. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1993958 

  13. Elmore, P. G., & Coleman, J. M. (2019). Middle school students’ analysis of political memes to support critical media literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.948 

  14. Fei, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, J., Feng, Y., & Zhou, J. (2021). Towards expressive communication with internet memes: A new multimodal conversation dataset and benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.01839. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.01839 

  15. Greene, V. S. (2019). “Deplorable” satire: Alt-right memes, white genocide tweets, and redpilling normies. Studies in American Humor, 5(1), 31-69. https://doi.org/10.5325/studamerhumor.5.1.0031 

  16. Hajimichael, M. (2021). Social Memes and Depictions of Refugees in the EU: Challenging Irrationality and Misinformation with a Media Literacy Intervention. The Epistemology of Deceit in a Postdigital Era: Dupery by Design, 1(1)195-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72154-1_11 

  17. Herrera, M. (2017). Distracted Boyfriend Meme. Retrieved 09/11/23 from https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/student_folklore_all/36/ 

  18. Iloh, C. (2021). Do it for the culture: The case for memes in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20(1), 16094069211025896. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211025896 

  19. Journell, W., & Clark, C. H. (2019). Political memes and the limits of media literacy. Unpacking fake news: an educator’s guide to navigating the media with students. Teachers College Press, New York.

  20. Kahan, D. M., Jamieson, K. H., Landrum, A., & Winneg, K. (2017). Culturally antagonistic memes and the Zika virus: An experimental test. Journal of Risk Research, 20(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1260631 

  21. Kozhamkulova, S., & Foster, B. (2019). Ironic mirrors of public discourse: Framing analysis of kazakhstani popular Internet memes. [Conference]. 2019 Central Eurasian Studies Society, Washington, DC, United States.

  22. Krystal, I. (2019). Nonverbal communication on the net: Mitigating misunderstanding through the manipulation of text and use of images in computer-mediated communication (Doctoral dissertation, University of Findlay). 

  23. Kurschilgen, M., & Marcin, I. (2019). Communication is more than information sharing: The role of status-relevant knowledge. Games and Economic Behavior, 113(1), 651-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.11.007 

  24. Lahey-McCoy, F. (2022). Tracing Virtual Sápmi: Communicating Sámi Narratives in the Age of the Meme (Master’s thesis, UiT Norges arktiske universitet).

  25. Lantagne, S. M. (2017). Famous on the internet: The spectrum of internet memes and the legal challenge of evolving methods of communication. U. Rich. L. Rev., 52(1), 387-399. 

  26. McGrath, A. E. (2013). Dawkins’ God: genes, memes, and the meaning of life. John Wiley & Sons.

  27. McReynolds-Pérez, J. (2022). Fetal aspirations: the humorous meme as a mobilizing tactic. Mobilization, 27(2), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-27-2-193 

  28. Meier, C., Jäggi, A., & Ammann, C. (2022). Relevant Communication Channels: Effective Information Transfer in Employee Communication. Management, 19(1), 21-34. 

  29. Mihailidis, P. (2015). Digital curation and digital literacy: Evaluating the role of curation in developing critical literacies for participation in digital culture. E-learning and Digital Media, 12(5-6), 443-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753016631868 

  30. Milner, R. M. (2013). Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the Occupy Wall Street movement. International journal of communication, 7(1), 34-40.

  31. Munir, A. (2019). Why ‘The Distracted Boyfriend’Meme is so popular. Retrieved 09/11/23 from https://atiyamunir.coventry.domains/atiyamunir/uncategorized/why-the-distracted-boyfriend-meme-is-so-popular/ 

  32. Natsuma, Y. (2023). The Influence of Political Memes on Belief on Fake News: A Dual Process Theory Perspective (Doctoral dissertation, Central European University). 

  33. Ndimele, O.M. (2001). Readings on language. Port Harcourt: Emhia books

  34. Newton, J. (2018). Evolutionary game theory: A renaissance. Games, 9(2), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.3390/g9020031 

  35. Onuora, N.J. & Obiakor,E.E (2020). Afrin traditional communication system for sustainable cultural heritage: Igbo people’s perspective. Ideal international journal of Igbo scholars forum, Nigeria. 13(1). 1-9.

  36. Paciello, M., D’Errico, F., Saleri, G., & Lamponi, E. (2021). Online sexist meme and its effects on moral and emotional processes in social media. Computers in human behavior, 116(1), 106655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106655 

  37. Parekh, H. J. (2020). Memes as Political Discourse (Doctoral dissertation, Pratt Institute).

  38. Pelletier-Gagnon, J., & Pérez Trujillo D, A. (2021). Colonizing Pepe: Internet memes as cyberplaces. Space and Culture, 24(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331218776188 

  39. Pilipets, E., & Paasonen, S. (2022). Nipples, memes, and algorithmic failure: NSFW critique of Tumblr censorship. new media & society, 24(6), 1459-1480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820979280 

  40. Pishghadam, R., Ebrahimi, S., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). Cultuling analysis: A new methodology for discovering cultural memes. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 8(2), 17-34.

  41. Ponton, D. M., & Mantello, P. (2021). Virality, contagion and public discourse. The role of memes as prophylaxis and catharsis in an age of crisis. Rhetoric and Communications Journal, 46(1), 44-63. 

  42. Rentschler, C. A., & Thrift, S. C. (2015). Doing feminism in the network: Networked laughter and the ‘Binders Full of Women’meme. Feminist theory, 16(3), 329-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700115604136 

  43. Rizzi, G., Gasparini, F., Saibene, A., Rosso, P., & Fersini, E. (2023). Recognizing misogynous memes: Biased models and tricky archetypes. Information Processing & Management, 60(5), 103474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103474. 

  44. Roy, D. (2017). Myths about memes. Journal of Bioeconomics, 19(1), 281-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-017-9250-2. 

  45. Rutar, T. (2021). Sociological limits and prospects of contemporary cultural evolutionary theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 51(4), 636-653. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12326 

  46. Seiffert-Brockmann, J., Wiggins, B., & Nothhaft, H. (2023). The meme’s-eye view of strategic communication: A case study of social movements from a memetic perspective. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 17(3), 245-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2023.2234348 

  47. Shandilya, E., Fan, M., & Tigwell, G. W. (2022, April). “I need to be professional until my new team uses emoji, GIFs, or memes first’’: New Collaborators’ Perspectives on Using Non-Textual Communication in Virtual Workspaces. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-13). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517514 

  48. Shomova, S. (2020). Meme literacy in Russia: Perceptions of internet memes by a student audience and issues of critical thinking. Central European Journal of Communication, 13(26), 266-283. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=876258 

  49. Steele, A. (2023). Free speech platforms and the impact of the US insurrection: Misinformation in memes (Master’s thesis, The University of Bergen).

  50. Stewart, J., and G. D`Angelo. (1988). Together: Communicating interpersonally. New York: Piandom House. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000795123582080 

  51. Tindale, C. W. (2017). Replicating reasons: Arguments, memes, and the cognitive environment. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 50(4), 566-588. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.50.4.0566 

  52. Wagner, A., & Schwarzenegger, C. (2020, May). A populism of lulz: the proliferation of humor, satire, and memes as populist communication in digital culture. In Perspectives on Populism and the Media (pp. 313-332). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845297392   

  53. Chavada, J. K. (2024). The role of teacher has changed in the context of classroom education in the 21st century. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 03(01), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.59231/sari7655

  54. Wang, J., & Wang, H. (2015). From a marketplace to a cultural space: Online meme as an operational unit of cultural transmission. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 45(3), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281615578847 

  55. Shehu, S. A. (2023). Contemporary Approaches and Challenges in Education: An Implication in the Use of Mobile Technologies in the New normal. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 02(02), 174–205. https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7582.

  56. Wong, E. F., & Holyoak, K. J. (2021). Cognitive and motivational factors driving sharing of internet memes. Memory & Cognition, 49(1), 863-872. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01134-1 

  57. Asubiojo, R. O. (2023). Effects Of Computer Assisted Instruction (Cai) On Secondary School Students’ Achievement in Basic Science and Technology Ekiti State. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 02(02), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7576

  58. Wong, E., Holyoak, K., & Priniski, H. (2022). Cognitive and emotional impact of politically-polarized internet memes about climate change. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 44, No. 44). 

  59. Maji, M. (2024). ROLE OF ARTIFICAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION. Edumania-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 02(01), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.59231/edumania/9016

  60. Xia, L., Baghaie, S., & Sajadi, S. M. (2023). The digital economy: Challenges and opportunities in the new era of technology and electronic communications. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 1(1)102411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102411

  61. Sumadevi, S. (2023). Impact of social media on Youth: Comprehensive Analysis. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 02(04), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.59231/sari7640

  62. Pervez, S. (2022). EXAMINING SOCIAL MEDIA AND HEALTH COMMUNICATION: SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CRITICAL ILLNESS. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 01(01), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7743356

  63. Asubiojo, R. O. (2023). Effects Of Computer Assisted Instruction (Cai) On Secondary School Students’ Achievement in Basic Science and Technology Ekiti State. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 02(02), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7576

Back

Contact​

Visit our main website www.icert.org.in

Copyright © 2024  International Council for Education, Research and Training  – All Rights Reserved.

Scroll to Top