Dynamism and Diversity in Teaching: What is Expected of Conventional Teaching of Sciences in the Year 2030?
Muraina, Ismail Olaniyi
Department of Computer Science, College of Information and Technology Education, Lagos State University of Education, Lagos Nigeria
Abstract
Dynamism is seen as the trait of being distinguished by intense activity and progress; or the inclination for constant change, activity, or progression. It can also refer to a philosophy or school of thought that emphasizes change or the processes that generate change as an essential component of reality. Dynamism is a word that evokes energy and a strong desire to see something realized. The paper analyzes the value of being dynamic in teaching, particularly in fields such as computer science, biology, physics, and chemistry, as opposed to the prevalent use of traditional approaches. It provides more information about the potential for online science education to start today and continue through 2030. Data were gathered from 200 school teachers (50 from pre-primary, 50 from primary, 50 from secondary, and 50 from tertiary) using a questionnaire instrument via Google Forms for the study, which uses a descriptive survey method. Before being put through Chronbach’s Alpha reliability test, the instrument was validated by colleagues in colleges and faculties of education; the 0.897 index shows that the instrument is quite trustworthy. Because the instrument was administered online, it was filled quickly and sent back to its intended location. Data was properly collated before being properly analyzed using charts for easy reading and visualization using the statistical program SPSS. The results indicate that there is no discernible difference between teachers who are prepared for online teaching and those who are not; additionally, there is a significantly lower rate of teachers who can use online tools that support online teaching compared to teachers who are not; and there is a strong likelihood that traditional teaching will be gradually phased out by 2030.
Keywords: Teaching, Teaching Dynamism, Conventional Teaching, Online Teaching, Year 2030, Sciences.
Impact Statement
Traditional teaching methods have a long history and have proven to be effective time and again; they provide important human interaction between teachers and students, fostering a sense of community and encouraging active engagement; however, incorporating technology into the classroom enriches the learning experience, increases engagement, and prepares students for a technologically driven society. Technology in education is gaining popularity around the world as a means of addressing the time and space constraints associated with traditional schooling. While several digitally enhanced teaching and learning approaches have challenged traditional teaching methods, it is unlikely that technology will completely replace traditional methods by 2030. Technology in the classroom can enhance learning by providing multisensory experiences, but it cannot replace in-person tutoring. Future instructors must modernize instruction by incorporating technology and creating an engaging, active learning environment. Combining traditional and technology-based teaching approaches is essential for a more effective learning environment.
Authors’ Profile
Dr Ismail Olaniyi MURAINA earned his BSc. Ed in Computer Science Education, MSc. Ed Computer Science Education, MSc. In Information Technology, and Ph.D. in Data Science in 2005, 2010, 2017, and 2022, respectively. He is currently working as a Lecturer in the Department of Computer Science at Lagos State University of Education, Lagos Nigeria since 2018. He is a member of TRC, STAN, TASET, IEEE, IACSIT, IAENG, ACM, ISDSA, MTTF, SEAN, ICERT, ISAC, and INSTICC since 2008 till date. He has published more than 90 research papers in reputable national and international journals. His main research work focuses on Data Science, Data Analytics, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology. He has 25 years of teaching experience and 15 years of research experience.
(Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9633-6080 )
References
Bhat, Shreeranga; D’Souza, Rio; Suresh, E.; Bhat, Sathyendra; Raju, Ragesh & s bhat, Vinayambika. (2021). Dynamic Classroom Strategies to Address Learning Diversity. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. 34. 694. 10.16920/jeet/2021/v34i0/157168.
Christiaan Henny (2016). 9 Things That Will Shape the Future of Education: What Learning Will Look Like In 20 Years? Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/9-things-shape-future-of-education-learning-20-years
Rachel R. Hill (2023). A Glimpse at How Education Will Possibly Look Like in 2050. Retrieved from https://studycrumb.com/future-of-education
Bernard Marr (2022). The 2 Biggest Future Trends In Education. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2022/01/21/the-2-biggest-future-trends-in-education/?sh=77f583ea2d6f
Janelle Cox (2016). 5 Essential 21st Century Teaching Strategies. Retrieved from https://www.teachhub.com/teaching-strategies/2016/08/5-essential-21st-century-teaching-strategies/
OECD. (2023). OECD Economic Outlook, Volume 2023 Issue 1. OECD iLibrary.
Senthil, B.Arul (2022). Conventional, Non-Conventional and Innovative Methods of Teaching. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370471022
Chidi, Bruce & Khoza, Climant & Matlala, Lesedi & Matlala, Lesedi. (2021). Do We Need ‘Triggers’ to Embrace Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education? A Reflection Paper. African Perspectives of Research in Teaching & Learning (APORTAL), 5(1), 20-26
Kalyani, V. & Murugan, Dr. (2021). Innovative Methods and Practices in Conventional Teaching Methods. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350487211
Albrahim, Fatimah. (2020). Online Teaching Skills and Competencies. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 19. 9-20.
Saileela, K & Arul, Lawrence (2021). Readiness for Online Teaching. 8. 225-236. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352993747
Guiamalon, Tarhata ; Alon, Sittie & Camsa, Sofia. (2021). TEACHERS’ ISSUES AND CONCERNS ON THE USE OF MODULAR LEARNING MODALITY. 10.46529/socioint.202115.
Ian Seymour Yeoman, & Una McMahon-Beatte, (2018). Teaching the future: learning strategies and student challenges. Journal of Tourism Futures, Vol. 4 Issue: 2, pp.163-167, https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-12-2016-0054
Moore, Renee & Berry, Barnett (2010). The Teachers of 2030. 67 (8). Retrieved from https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/the-teachers-of-2030
Boudreau, Emily (2020). What does the Future of Education look like from Here? Retrieved from https://www.gse.harvard.edu/ideas/askwith-education-forum/20/12/what-future-education-looks-here
Adewale, S. and Tahir, M.B. (2022), “Virtual learning environment factors as predictors of students’ learning satisfaction during COVID-19 period in Nigeria”, Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 120-133. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-10-2021-0121
Studynlearn (2023). Personalized Learning: Top 10 Benefits – How Does It Help Students? Retrieved from https://studynlearn.com/blog/
RiseVision (2021). Digital Technology Tools for the Classroom. Retrieved from https://www.risevision.com/blog/digital-technology-tools-for-the-classroom#:~:text=Digital%20tools%20improve%20collaboration%20by%20linking%20teachers%20to,63%25%20of%20educators%20believe%20educational%20technology%20accelerates%20learning.
Affleck, Victoria (2017). 96% of teachers believe #EdTech has a positive impact on education. Retrieved from https://www.fenews.co.uk/skills/96-of-teachers-believe-tech-has-a-positive-impact-oneducation/#:~:text=According%20to%20a%20recent%20report%20by%20Smoothwall%2C%20a,were%20noticeably%20more%20engaged%20when%20technology%20is%20used.
Bates, Laura (2016). 18 EdTech Stats About the Current State of Technology in Education. Retrieved from https://www.fractuslearning.com/edtech-stats/