International Council for Education, Research and Training

Incorporating Indigenous Knowledge Systems into the Teaching of Environmental Chemistry

Kumar, Sandeep

Professor of Chemistry, and ‘by courtesy of Psychology’, School of Applied and Behavioral Sciences, NIILM University Kaithal Haryana

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0775-698X

Abstract

This research explores the integration of Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) into the teaching of Environmental Chemistry at the secondary and tertiary levels. The study investigates how traditional ecological knowledge, accumulated over centuries by Indigenous communities, can enhance students’ understanding of environmental processes, sustainability, and stewardship. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from teachers, students, and Indigenous knowledge holders across multiple regions. The findings reveal that incorporating IKS not only improves engagement and contextual understanding but also promotes respect for cultural diversity and environmental ethics. The study provides pedagogical frameworks and strategies for effective curriculum integration and recommends policy reforms to institutionalize the inclusion of IKS in science education.

Keywords: Indigenous Knowledge Systems, Environmental Chemistry, Science Education, Curriculum Integration, Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Sustainability, Cultural Relevance

Impact statement

Incorporating Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) into environmental chemistry education will foster a more holistic and culturally relevant understanding of environmental issues. This approach will empower students to appreciate diverse perspectives on ecological balance, sustainable resource management, and the interconnectedness of natural systems. By integrating traditional practices and scientific principles, students can develop innovative solutions to contemporary environmental challenges, promoting community engagement and stewardship. This interdisciplinary approach will not only enrich their academic experience but also cultivate a deeper respect for Indigenous cultures and their invaluable contributions to environmental sustainability.

About The Author

Dr Sandeep Kumar is working as Professor of Chemistry and ‘by courtesy of psychology’ NIILM University Kaithal Haryana, and have more than two decades experience in teaching, research, curriculum development, counselling and leadership. His areas of interest are chemical education, research, behavioural science, teacher education and practices. As resource person, he has conducted more than 225 training programs for the school and higher education teachers. He has been awarded with numerous prestigious National and International Awards. He has participated and presented research articles in more than 200 National and International conferences. He has been invited as keynote speaker, guest of honour, conference chair, and resources person in various National and International Conferences. He is associated with various National and International Organizations. 

References

 

  1. Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between Indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change, 26(3), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00560.x

  2. Aikenhead, G. S., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(3), 539–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-007-9067-8

  3. Barnhardt, R., & Oscar Kawagley, A. O. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska Native ways of knowing. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2005.36.1.008

  4. Battiste, M. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and pedagogy in First Nations education: A literature review with recommendations. Indian and northern affairs Canada.

  5. Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred ecology (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123843

  6. Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Clear Light Publishers.

  7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

  8. Fadeeva, Z., & Mochizuki, Y. (2010). Higher education for today and tomorrow: University appraisal for diversity, innovation and change towards sustainable development. Sustainability Science, 5(2), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-010-0106-0

  9. George, J. M. (1999). Indigenous knowledge as a component of school curriculum. International Review of Education, 45(5–6), 483–493.

  10. Hart, P., & Nolan, K. (1999). A Critical Analysis of Research in Environmental Education. Studies in Science Education, 34(1), 1–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269908560148

  11. Kincheloe, J. L., & Steinberg, S. R. (2008). Indigenous knowledges in education: Complexities, dangers, and profound benefits. Sage Publications.

  12. Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto Press.

  13. Kumar, S. (2024a). Remediation of chemical bonding misconception through conceptual change text. Edumania-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(3), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.59231/edumania/9056

  14. Kumar, S. (2024b). An analysis of common misconceptions in chemistry education and practices. International Journal of Applied and Behavioral Sciences, 01(01), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.70388/ijabs24701

  15. Kumar, S. (2024c). Effect of Concept Based Cartoons as art integration on Alternative Concepts in Chemical Bonding. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(3), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7735

  16. McKinley, E. (2005). Locating the global: Culture, language and science education for Indigenous students. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000325861

  17. Michell, H., Vizina, Y., Augustus, C., & Sawyer, J. (2008). Learning Indigenous science from place: Research study examining Indigenous-based science perspectives in Saskatchewan First Nations and Métis community contexts. Canadian Council on Learning.

  18. Muller, J. (2009). Forms of knowledge and curriculum coherence. Journal of Education and Work, 22(3), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080902957905

  19. Nadasdy, P. (1999). The politics of TEK: Power and the “integration” of knowledge. Arctic Anthropology, 36(1–2), 1–18.

  20. Nakashima, D., Galloway McLean, K., Thulstrup, H., Ramos Castillo, A., & Rubis, J. T. (2012). Weathering uncertainty: Traditional knowledge for climate change assessment and adaptation. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

  21. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage Publications.

  22. Punch, K. F. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. Sage Publications.

  23. Roth, W.-M. (2009). Dialogism: A Bakhtinian perspective on science and learning. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087908645

  24. Semali, L. M., & Kincheloe, J. L. (Eds.). (1999). What is Indigenous knowledge? Voices from the academy. Falmer Press.

  25. Snively, G., & Corsiglia, J. (2001). Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 6–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200101)85:1<6::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-R

  26. Tsuji, L. J., & Ho, E. (2002). Traditional environmental knowledge and western science: In search of common ground. Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 22(2), 327–360.

  27. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2010). Learning to live together sustainably. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

  28. Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.

Back

Contact​

Visit our main website www.icert.org.in

Copyright © 2025  International Council for Education, Research and Training  – All Rights Reserved.

Scroll to Top